When purchasing the vehicle Brian specified that it must contain a bunk, why was this?

Explanation: • He wanted the extra room that the bunk space would provide: No, this would not be a good use of the extra money required for the bunk fitment and would not make economic sense.
• He sometimes takes his young son with him and this is a useful space where he can play as Brian drives: No, this would be dangerous and if any passengers were carried in the vehicle, they must use seats fitted with seat belts and use the seat belts provided.
• It makes the vehicle easier to sell after 5 years: No, it would not make economic sense to specify any extras on a vehicle with a view to subsequent resale as their value after this length of time would have depreciated significantly.
• It is legally required if he wants to take his regular daily rest in the vehicle: Yes, EU 561/2006, the Drivers Hours regulations require that where a daily rest is taken on the vehicle then that vehicle must be fitted with a bunk.

Category: CPC Case Studies: Technical Matters